The EIA’s uranium report gives a useful check on the idea that every utility has to buy as soon as the spot market tightens. US civilian reactor owners and operators held about 118 million pounds of uranium equivalent at the end of 2025, up from 115 million a year earlier. The fuel loaded into reactors during 2025 contained about 40.9 million pounds of uranium equivalent. https://www.eia.gov/uranium/marketing/ Divide one by the other and you get roughly 2.9. It is tempting to call that nearly three years of fuel, but inventories include material at different stages of the fuel cycle. Uranium that still needs conversion or enrichment cannot fill the same role as a finished fuel assembly ready for the next reload. The aggregate also says little about how evenly inventories are distributed between operators. There is another useful split in the same report. Total US commercial inventories rose 9%, but the amount held by reactor owners and operators rose only about 3%. Inventory held by suppliers rose much faster. More material in the overall system does not mean every utility has added the same amount of protection. That helps explain why spot buying can be quiet even if utilities still have meaningful future requirements. An operator with material and services lined up for its next reload can afford to wait for better terms. It can also sign a contract for later delivery without buying anything in the spot market that week. For investors, a decline in utility inventories might indicate that buyers are using their buffers. A pickup in term contracting could show they are protecting future deliveries while those buffers are still intact. Those signals can arrive at different times, which is one reason I would be careful about using inventory alone to time the uranium cycle. Which would change your view more: utilities drawing down inventory, or utilities committing to more future supply before they need to? -Bench4552
CryptoAlerta — análise de criptomoedas e mercado em tempo real