A woman called into “The Ramsey Show” on Oct. 16 to describe how a six-figure loan to a relative ended in a total loss. She and her husband had given roughly $200,000 to her sister and the sister’s boyfriend to launch a countertop business that eventually failed. The venture collapsed about four years ago, the couple behind it split up, and the caller was left with a difficult choice: sue or walk away. Host and personal finance author Dave Ramsey responded with advice he has repeated for years: Either treat money given to relatives as a gift or decline to lend it in the first place. But the caller’s experience raises the bigger question of what happens when financial help within a family goes wrong. Also Read: Dave Ramsey’s retirement spending rule hits a market test Ramsey’s blunt rule on why relatives should never be borrowers Ramsey argued that calling a family transfer a “loan” creates two possible failures at once, because the lender risks both the money and the relationship. Someone who cannot repay a relative tends to avoid the conversation altogether, which erodes the bond from both sides over time. His exact words during the Oct. 16 episode spelled out the rule without caveats. Never loan family money under any circumstance. If you have the money, you think they need it, and you want to give it to them, give it. But if you won't give it to them, then you shouldn't be doing this. A YouGov poll of 2,225 adults, commissioned by Bankrate in November 2021, found that 44% of people who helped a relative or friend financially experienced a negative outcome. Among that same group, 38% of lenders lost money outright, and 23% reported that the relationship was harmed. Lenders in that group got burned one way or another, either losing money, suffering credit damage, or watching the relationship break down, Ted Rossman, former principal analyst at Bankrate, told ABC7 News. The tax code favors outright gifts over informal loans between relatives The gap between gifts and loans extends into federal tax law, because the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) draws a sharp line between them. A gift within the annual exclusion generally requires no filing, while an informal loan demands a level of formality most families skip. Intrafamily loans must have a signed agreement, a fixed repayment schedule, and an interest rate at or above the IRS Applicable Federal Rate (AFR). A loan missing those elements can be reclassified as a taxable gift, and the lender may owe tax on interest never collected, Charles Schwab explained in its guide to family lending. More Dave Ramsey: Dave Ramsey warns American workers on 401(k)s, IRAs, Social Security Dave Ramsey warns Americans on 401(k) plans Dave Ramsey says this insurance product is horrendous for families The gift route sidesteps that complexity, because the 2026 annual exclusion lets each person transfer up to $19,000 per recipient without filing. Married couples can double that figure to $38,000 through gift splitting, and the lifetime exemption stands at $15 million per person, the IRS confirmed. Most families will never owe gift tax at those thresholds, which removes the last practical argument for structuring family help as a loan. The IRS treats family gifts and informal loans differently, making outright transfers simpler and potentially more tax-efficient for relatives. izusek / Getty Images How a $200,000 gift changes a retiree’s annual spending The caller’s $200,000 figure has a deeper consequence for anyone living on a fixed retirement income because the loss isn’t a one-time hit. Using the commonly cited 4% withdrawal rate as a benchmark, that sum supports roughly $8,000 in annual spending power, 24/7 Wall St calculated. A retiree with $400,000 in savings who gives away half drops annual income from $16,000 to $8,000, a 50% pay cut that changes daily life. A retiree with $2 million faces softer arithmetic, because $200,000 is 10% of the portfolio and income falls from $80,000 to $72,000, That contrast is the core of Ramsey’s “if you have the money” test, a practical retirement-income stress check. Ramsey would reject a gift that halves a modest nest egg, though the same amount barely registers against a large portfolio. Compounding widens the loss further, because $200,000 earning a 7% average annual return would grow to roughly $393,000 over a decade, 24/7 Wall St noted. The caller lost the original transfer, along with years of potential investment growth that her retirement portfolio can never recover. What to weigh before answering a relative’s request for money Whether to give the money as a gift or extend it as a loan depends on the strength of the lender’s familial relationships and the nature of the individuals involved, Schwab noted. Schwab frames the choice as one that turns on circumstances rather than a universal rule, which puts the weight on the lender to reassess what the specific borrower is likely to honor before any money changes hands. Rossman offered a guardrail for anyone leaning toward yes: Don’t lend more than you can afford to lose. Rossman’s standard treats every family transfer as a gift rather than a debt, an approach Bankrate says reduces the risk to both the relationship and the lender’s finances. Ramsey lands at the same conclusion, holding that the only safe family transfer is the one the lender is already prepared to see leave entirely. Everything short of that, in his view, should not happen at all. Related: Dave Ramsey raises a $185K risk Fidelity pegs for retirees
CryptoAlerta — análise de criptomoedas e mercado em tempo real